Amazon.com Widgets

You are viewing posts from November, 2009
  New Moon sets new opening day record.
Posted by: Mike on Nov 21st, 2009 Leave a Comment »

It’s a sad day for us The Dark Knight fans. Or for those of us who just love movies in general.

The Twilight Saga: New Moon has set a new opening day record of just over $72million.  That beats the previous record, held by our loved The Dark Knight by just over $5.6million.

New Moon has also set a new “single day” record, and a “single day – Friday” record, for its opening day.

Despite making a boatload of money, people don’t seem to be enjoying the latest “Twilight” movie.  As of now, Rotten Tomatoes’ current rating is 29%, and IMDb is only at a 4.4/10.

Have you seen New Moon? Is it as terrible as I’d guess it’d be?




  2012
Posted by: Mike on Nov 15th, 2009 1 Comment »

2012 Review

2012

Let’s get this out of the way right up front: 2012 is not nearly as horrible as you may have read.  Pulling $65 million in its first weekend, it doesn’t seem like people are caring what reviews say, anyway.  Given my unhealthy love of John Cusack, I had to see the movie.  It looks like others had the same desire, as 2012 was number one at the box office this weekend.

Roland Emmerich’s known for primarily one thing: destroying the entire freakin’ planet.  Proof? He’s directed The Day After Tomorrow, Independence Day, and Godzilla.  If you need more proof that this guy wants the planet to be destroyed, you need to get out more.  What better person to helm the direction of 2012?  None, I say.

For those of you living under a rock, here’s the rundown of what 2012 is about:

The planet is doomed.  It’s 2012, the end of the Mayan calendar, and they’ve predicted we’re all going to die.  Some scientist type folks discover that the center of the Earth is heating up too fast and that we’re all doomed.  The Governments of the world get involved, and begin a plan to save the human race.

That’s the summation of the film.  The actuality of the movie is that there’s tons of action, lots of destruction and a whole ton of amazing CGI effects.

I’ll admit that I didn’t think the movie was perfect, far from it.  But I didn’t have the expectation that this was going to be the next The Prestige or The Wizard of Oz or anything. I expected to have a good time watching things explode, fall apart, and a bunch of humans fight for their lives.  I got what I wanted.

I could have done without some parts, certainly.  I wouldn’t have objected if the movie was an hour shorter.  Would that have worked? Doubtful, given the importance of pretty much everything that happens in the film. But I still would have liked it to be a bit shorter.  Action type movies should be pushing three hours, especially mindless ones where you can doze off at times because you don’t have to pay attention to anything that isn’t exploding.

The ultimate message of the film is one of hope. It’s Hollywood trying to badger into our heads that humans are good at heart. (I feel like there’s a lot more of these movies lately than there used to be, which is fine. I’m just sayin’.)

I’m glad I saw this on the big screen.  However, doing so made me realize something: big screen films aren’t as impressive as Blu-ray discs are.  While the sound is still better than what most people have at home, Blu-ray is a far superior picture to what I’ve seen in theaters lately.  Movie theaters need to step up the game if they want to keep butts in seats.  While you certainly can’t compete with a big screen at home, watching it on a smaller screen with people you won’t be afraid to “shush” is certainly worth it. Price of tickets and snacks aside, watching at home is generally a more enjoyable experience, for me at least.

My wrapup: if you dig any of Emmerich’s films about the world falling apart, 2012 is for you.  It’s got everything you’d expect from seeing the trailer: the world falls apart, John Cusack is the everyman, the kids are adorable, a surprise spot by a wacky Woody Harrelson, and overall catastrophe.  What more do you want from a feel-good mindless film?  Check out 2012 while it’s still in theaters.  It’s not as bad as you’re thinking it’ll be.




  Zombieland
Posted by: Mike on Nov 15th, 2009 Leave a Comment »

Zombieland Review

Zombieland

It’s been a long six months since I saw Star Trek, which was my favorite movie of the year.  It’s been six months, so it’s tough to compare that with what could be my absolute favorite movie of the year, Zombieland.

Thinking back on how much I enjoyed both films, Zombieland stands out more.  I had more fun with Zombieland. I left the theater smiling after both flicks, sure.  But was Zombieland a better movie than Star Trek?  I think, in the end, it was.

For those of you who haven’t seen Zombieland yet, you’re missing out on a world of pure awesome.  There’s absolutely nothing, at all, wrong with Zombieland in the slightest bit.  It’s picture perfect in every aspect of the digital world.  There’s gore. There’s zombies. There’s a love story. There’s a hysterical cast.  There’s an epic tale of trying to survive when every odd is stacked against you.

Did I mention the zombies? Good, because there’s a ton of them. And they all want to eat our main characters (Eisenberg, Harrelson, Stone and Breslin.)

If you enjoy the “comedy horror” genre at all, I absolutely guarantee that you’ll love Zombieland. There’s no doubt about it.

And it’s not just the zombies and the story and the script that make the movie so brilliant.  It’s the little things, like how the shots are put together.  The great use of onscreen graphics when each of the “rules” to survive is talked about by our main character Columbus (Jesse Eisenberg).  It’s everything all put together that makes this movie so fantastic.

You’re reading this thinking to yourself “you sound like a rambling idiot”, and you’re right, I do.  There’s just not enough good things I can say about Zombieland, it’s just that good.  Enough ramblin’, go see the movie before it’s too late.  You won’t regret it.  This is certainly one for the DVD shelf when it comes out on Blu-ray.




© 2005 - present | All images represented here remain the property of their original owners. MovieSnobs.net claims no ownership of any promotional image, movie still, video or press shot displayed on this website!